Curse

foo · Nov 07, 2006, 07:55 PM // 19:55

/signed.

when ch2 came out we asked, how are we supposed to maintain 6 chars with storage meant for only 4? so they gave us the material storage. now, with after buying ch3 for, among the rest, 2 or 3 extra slots, we should ask, how should our storage be used to hold stuff for 8, 9, or even more character?

Add dye storage to that.

c_ras · Nov 08, 2006, 04:11 PM // 16:11

That is exactly what I am saying. I figured this was brought up before, and it SHOULD start a GW revolution. The puny little storage they give us isn't quite cutting it. And its not like the backpack and such are much either, seeing how if I have 4 weapon slots, I have to spend 4-8 slots to hold weapns and/or offhand (depending on if they are one handed with the use of an offhand or two handed). Then of course, you have different types of armor to suit different situation. I find keys all the time, and I regretablly have to sell them or simply not buy them any simply because I don't have room for them. This drives me nuts. The dye storage would be a great addition too. I hate creating mules just to carry all of my stuff.

leeky baby · Nov 08, 2006, 04:12 PM // 16:12

/signed

Faer · Nov 08, 2006, 05:27 PM // 17:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by c_ras

I'm sure its been said before, but I don't feel like thumbing through all the posts to find it

That's why we have a sticky full of ideas. Perhaps you should thumb through that, sometime.

c_ras · Nov 08, 2006, 05:55 PM // 17:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carinae Dragonblood

I'd only agree to Dye Storage if the stack size was small, like 10 dyes, not 250.

I totally agree on you there. Having stack sizes of 250 for dye storage is both impractical and not good. Like you said, I would like to see a lower number..I would say possibly 25 as the upper limit. I think you would see dye prices rise a bit, but it would make dyes worthy again and a little more prestige. It would almost be like a little kid walking into Toys R Us for the first in his/her life.

zelira · Nov 08, 2006, 06:09 PM // 18:09

/signed

Expanding storage of any kind, signed.

Ms Epilady · Nov 08, 2006, 07:08 PM // 19:08

/signed

I was just discussing this issue the other day with my guildies. We all have the three guild wars games and storage has really become an issue. Most of my vault storage is for keys and our guild leader holds all the dyes for the guild. A combination key/dye tab in the vault would be idea...essential...I want it!!!

Chaco Nautzi · Nov 08, 2006, 11:47 PM // 23:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jetdoc

/signed. I'm a big fan of a dye tab, and also think a key tab would increase the gold sinks for the GW economy - and this would be a good thing.

What exactly do you mean by "gold sinks"?

and if it's what I think it's meaning, they have done a lot of things to help this along already such as the weekend events,(double dye, double green, double golds from chests, along with various other weekends) and outside of the weekends, they took away 2 man UW groups(55/ss) and so basically, other than runs, I have no source of income(not including occasionaly gold drops) besides generous friends

kaya · Nov 09, 2006, 12:00 AM // 00:00

/signed for keyrings. something that's universal for every character, and something you can access from you person rather than the storage.

Ms Epilady · Jan 12, 2007, 10:59 PM // 22:59

/signed

I thought this was worthy of being brought up again. Since I do own all the campaigns, I find it a real annoyance finding room in my storage for all the keys. Since there is room for another tab in the storage as it is now, why not make it a key/dye storage area! PLZ!!!

Vàna Rúndóttir · Jan 13, 2007, 09:33 AM // 09:33

I see no real difference between carrying keys, craft materials, or collectors items. All are intended for use once you find the right chest or NPC. If we had more slots to hold them we would only put off finding the right chest or NPC for longer, or stockpile them for later trades. Sure I would like more storage space for them, but it doesn't make playing the game much better for me. On the other hand having more selections of armour (with various runes applied) and weapons makes my game experience richer, since then I can switch to more varied builds and experiment with skill sets more easily. So I would prefer a wardrobe NPC for armour and weapon storage more. As for dyes, I do like to carry some of each colour, if only to get a better close up look at new weapons in the preview screen, but a couple of each colour is enough for one account, and if my wardrobe NPC had 'virtual preview' versions of the dye colours then I could just buy the ones I wanted instead of carrying them all around. Ideally, the wardrobe NPC would allow me to preview armour I didn't yet own too, so perhaps armour vendors could take on this extra function.

chaotic1ne · Jan 13, 2007, 09:48 AM // 09:48

/signed
always need more room for storage :P

SkyHiRider · Jan 13, 2007, 10:40 AM // 10:40

/signed for dye storage
/notsigned for key storage

Omnidragon42 · Jan 13, 2007, 11:41 AM // 11:41

/not signed for any specialized storage

Mats storage was a great idea, because it allowed you to keep the odd bolt of linen that might come in handy 6 months down the road in a new campaign when its sold out at the trader.

We don't need any other special storage. What we need is more of the same kind of storage that we have (And I think mats storage should got to 1000... damn iron :P)